Srinagar, Feb 8: The reputed human rights watchdog Amnesty International Wednesday said Indian army men must stand trial when facing charges of serious violations of human rights instead of seeking immunity under the controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA).
Welcoming a ruling of Supreme Court of India on the blanket immunity under the AFSPA, Armed Forces Special Powers Act, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific Program Director Sam Zarifi said, “There should be no need to obtain prior approval for prosecuting security personnel charged with having committed grave human rights violations such as rape and murder”.
“While the Apex Court’s remark opens the chance for the prosecution of the eight army personnel Amnesty International reiterates its demand for the repeal of the AFSPA, which has been in force in various parts of north-east India for over five decades and in Jammu and Kashmir since 1990,” he said.
On 4 February, Supreme Court of India stated that the Indian army could not invoke the AFSPA to avoid the prosecution of eight officers charged with the March 2000 killing of five villagers at Pathribal in South Kashmir.
Under the often criticized special powers, security personnel cannot be prosecuted for human rights violations without approval from the central government.
Citing human rights defenders in India, Zarifi said of the 50 instances in which the J&K authorities had sought approval for prosecuting security men for grave human rights violations – including torture, rape and extra-judicial executions – Indian home ministry has said it had “recommended” approval in eight cases and the Defence ministry none.
“For far too long, Indian security forces have used the AFSPA as a cover for serious human rights violations. The Supreme Court’s statement should finally allow some light to be shed on some of the army’s most gruesome violations – providing some hope for justice for the victims and a step forward imposing the rule of law,” he said.
Indian army had claimed that five Lashkar-e-Toiba militants were killed in the encounter in the Pathribal in South Kashmir in 2000. It had claimed that the five were allegedly involved in the shooting of 35 members of the Sikh community at Chhattisingpura in the Valley prior to the visit of the then United States’ President Bill Clinton to India in the same month. However, CBI’s investigation showed that the five people killed were in fact villagers from Brariangan, Halan and Islamabad.
“The AFSPA has provisions giving protection to personnel engaged in armed operations in designated areas from any legal proceedings unless it is approved by the Government of India. This rarely happens in practice, as a result of which these laws have provided impunity for perpetrators of grave human rights violations,” Sam Zarifi added.
After a series of protests in Manipur and Kashmir, Indian government in November 2004, appointed a five-member committee led by a former Judge of the Supreme Court, B. P. Jeevan Reddy to review the AFSPA. The committee, in its June 205 report, recommended repeal of the act, but wanted its substantive provisions be transferred to an existing legislation – the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – a move which drew protests from human rights organizations. India’s Armed Forces and the Ministry of Defence are steadfastly opposed to the repeal of AFSPA.