Real Scientific Consensus
It seems the real “scientific consensus” is radically different from the “Anthropogenic Global Warmers,” or “AGW” followers’ beliefs. The AGW “scientific consensus” was a non-existing, complete fabrication. In 2010, Fred Dardick stated: “30,000 Anti-Global Warming Scientists Can’t Be Wrong.”
The academic journal Nature Magazine, will publish a paper this June showing atmospheric carbon dioxide [CO2] is responsible for only 5-10 percent of observed warming on Earth. But the author, Professor Jyrki Kauppinen explains, “The climate is warming, yes, but not because of greenhouse gases.” Nature’s published column showed conclusively Gore’s acclaimed “scientific consensus” supporting “AGW” was a total myth.
‘Eco-Censors’ Involved With ‘AGW’
For years scientists have been trying to inform public “eco-censors” there are thousands of bona-fide scientists who do not buy into the global warming hoax.
Since 2009, more than 238 physicists, including Nobel Prize winner Ivar Giaever, and professors from Harvard, MIT, Princeton, UCLA, and dozens of others have signed a letter to the American Physical Society saying scientific data did not support the conclusion increased CO2 concentrations are responsible for “AGW.”
Even as early as 2009, over 700 international scientists expressed doubts over man-made global warming claims. In this recent report US Government atmospheric scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg said, “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”
So in a huge effort to document global warming dissent in the scientific community, 31,486 Americans with degrees in science have signed the Global Warming Petition Project to exclaim: “the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity.” Most of the best minds in the US and worldwide are in total agreement: The exclaimed AGW “scientific consensus,” is a complete falsehood and is non-existing.
Polar Ice Continuing To Grow
But even NASA with updated data from satellite readings, has revealed earth’s polar ice caps have not retreated significantly since 1979. Only then did most scientists have access to these measurements. Per NASA’s latest data, both ice caps are now 5 percent above their mean ice average.
Antarctic Sea Ice Sets New Record High, shows how the Antarctic ice shelf has increased over the past few years. Sea ice extent in Antarctica set a new record high for May, per data from National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). They revealed sea ice extent around Antarctica reached 12.10 million sq. km. in May-some 12 percent greater than the long term average for the period during [1981-2010] of 10.79 million sq.km. May sea ice extent in Antarctica is growing at a rate of 2.9 percent/decade, per the NSIDC. [Reporting Climate Science, 3 June 2015]
Climate Depot’s Mark Morano shows how Comprehensive Analysis Reveals NOAA Wrongfully Applying ‘Master Algorithm’ To Whitewash Temperature History. Energy Physicist Mike Brakey writes us why he is not surprised about NOAA’s congressional investigation.
NOAA Admits To ‘Cooking The Books’
In May 2015, NOAA confirmed in writing the massive revision of Maine climate history in Black-Swan Climate Theory, and reported there was no accident. NOAA states the changes were intentional and were justified. NOAA’s written statement included these words: .” ..improvements in the dataset, and brings our value much more in line with what was observed at the time. The new method used stations in neighboring Canada to inform estimates for data-sparse areas within Maine (a great improvement).”
Polar Bears Continuing To Expand
Reports of Global polar bear population size is about 26,000 (20,000-32,000) seem accurate. But initial reports from the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group with Chairman Dr. Dag Vongraven, says its global population count of 20,000 bears is simply a qualified guess with a large potential error. Part of a statement the PBSG proposed to insert as a footnote in their forthcoming Circumpolar Polar Bear Action Plan draft: “Consequently, there is either no, or only rudimentary, knowledge to support guesses about the possible abundance of polar bears in approximately half the areas they occupy. … It is important to realize that this range never has been an estimate of total abundance in a scientific sense, but simply a qualified guess given to satisfy public demand.”
In actuality, none of these “global population estimates” (since 2001) were anywhere close to estimates of actual world population of polar bears – rather, they were only estimates of the subpopulations Arctic scientists have counted. In particular, PBSG’s most recent estimate ignores five large subpopulation regions which potentially contain 1/3 as many additional bears as the official estimate.
Former Harvard Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: Karl et al. hiatus killer is “research” that began with conclusions about possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. He pointed out how NOAA orchestrated temperature record updates, and how the temperature ‘haitus’ – 18.5 years of no warming – was explained. Motl also described how NOAA planned to ‘bust’ the pause in global warming.
In THE HOCKEY SCHTICK, there’s an updated list of more than 60 excuses for the 18-26 year statistically significant ‘pause’ in global warming, including recent scientific papers, media quotes, blogs, and related debunkings. Intuitively, they exclaim: “If you can’t explain the ‘pause,’ you can’t explain the cause.”
No One Knows In AGW
The facts are that a huge chasm exists between AGWers and those who know [CO2]-induced climate have nothing in common. One knows now that polar bear populations are actually increasing, NOAA altering records, and NASA admitting growth in polar ice caps. And nobody who believes in ‘AGW’ can put their finger on reasons why there’s been almost a 19-year hiatus in ‘AGW’, or any climate escalation.
Already, new data from NASA has proved Obama, Al Gore, and all those ‘Anthropogenic Global Warmers’ dead-wrong. Probably they’ve not looked at graphs of what’s happened to [CO2] over earth’s eon history.