The Drugging of America’s Children

The number of American children under 19 years of age who are prescribed psychotropic drugs in this country is staggering. Approximately 6 million children, including 10% of all 6-18 year old boys in the United States are on psychotropic drugs including Ritalin despite the fact that there is no scientific evidence that a chemical imbalance in the brain is the cause of ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). There is no biological test for ADHD; the diagnosis is based only on observation of behavioral symptoms. To this day, there is no independent, scientifically accepted valid test for ADHD.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a relatively new disorder. It was created by a vote at a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in 1987. The symptoms of ADHD include a child not paying attention to detail, making careless mistakes, not listening when spoken to, forgetfulness, fidgeting and running, climbing or talking excessively. This sure sounds like most boys and girls in their growing years. In fact, three out of four youths diagnosed with ADHD are boys. Of course a small percentage of children do suffer from legitimate mental illnesses, but the widespread use of Ritalin and other drugs on youngsters who simply exhibit typical youthful energetic, fidgety, and impatient behavior is almost criminal. The Food and Drug Administration has stated that these psychotropic drugs cause suicidal behavior, mania, psychosis, hallucinations and hostility which has been shown in the Virginia Tech shooting, Columbine High School shooting and seven other shootings, where these psychiatric drugs were the common denominator.

Two federal government programs may also be contributing to the skyrocketing diagnoses of ADHD in school children. These diagnoses have been accompanied by surging sales of Ritalin, a stimulant used to treat ADHD. The drug produces effects similar to cocaine and amphetamines. The _Supplemental Security Income Program_ hands out cash to low-income parents whose children are diagnosed as having ADHD, which the government accepts as a learning disability. _Special-Education_ grant money is also awarded to schools each year by the Department of Education for every child diagnosed with ADHD. The government began funding schools and families for ADHD children in the early 1990s. Since then Ritalin sales have nearly tripled.

To make matters worse, the US government has begun to implement a mental health screening policy for America’s 52 million school children and 6 million school employees under the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. One obvious beneficiary of the proposal is the pharmaceutical industry, which will sell the psychotropic drugs that undoubtedly will be prescribed to millions of additional American schoolchildren under the new screening program.

This very intrusive government program is sure to provide a wider market for high-priced antidepressants and antipsychotic medication. The possibility exists that this new government supported mandatory mental health screening program is the end result of sophisticated marketing, the funding of selected ADHD advocacy groups and political contributions on the part of the pharmaceutical industry. Especially when one considers that pharmaceutical companies underwrite 30% of the American Psychiatric Association budget and spend multi-millions of dollars on sophisticated advertising and public relations campaigns to promote these drugs. According to the Washington watchdog group, the Center for Responsive Politics, between 1998 and 2006, the pharmaceutical industry also spent over $1 billion supporting political candidates and political action committees, more than any other U.S. industry. In the 2007 elections, the Pharmaceutical industry contributed $17.8 million to political candidates and political action committees.

Parents, children, and their private doctors should decide whether a child has mental health problems, not government bureaucrats. Parents must do everything possible to retain responsibility and control over their children’s well-being. There seems to be no end to the government’s desire to rule every aspect of our lives, including how we raise our children. Forced mental health screening is just the latest of many state usurpations of parental authority through politically-correct school curricula, mandatory vaccines, interference with family discipline, etc. All represent assaults on families and parental rights.

For these reasons, I support “The Parental Consent Act of 2007” (HR-2387 of the 110^th Congress), introduced by Congressman Ron Paul. This bill is designed to keep federal funds from paying for universal or mandatory mental health screening of children and it protects the parental rights of parents so that they can raise their own children and make decisions about what is best for their children.

Hot this week

Did David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?

Dr. Omerbashich says the Royal Swedish Academy is a Crime Scene and he has the proof that Nobel laureates stole his discovery.

New Approaches to Disaster Relief Challenges

Disaster relief has always been a challenge. NASA, Google,...

3 Legitimate Money Making Methods to Supplement Your Income

In a perfect world, when your landlord raises your...

2016 Predictions by World Renowned Medium and Psychic Lindy Baker

World renowned medium and psychic Lindy Baker is interviewed by The Hollywood Sentinel, discussing psychic power, the spirit world, life after death, areas of concern in 2016, and much more.

Digital Coupon Customers Spending More Than Double At Stores

A new study shows that customers who use digital coupons go shopping more for groceries and other household goods more often and spend more on their shopping trips.

Military Begins New Testosterone-Deficiency Screening Policy for Male Service Members

The Defense Health Agency has implemented a new testosterone-deficiency screening policy for male service members, creating one of the most notable changes to military men's health screening in 2026. Under the guidance released in September

Jay Sunde on Why Operators Should Own the Building

Most small business buyers focus on the company and treat the real estate as someone else's problem. Jay Sunde took the opposite approach.

Spray Foam vs. Fiberglass vs. Cellulose: Lane Pace Explains What’s Best for Your Home

Homeowners searching for the best type of insulation often expect a single winner. Spray foam, fiberglass and cellulose all show up.

The Shameful Documentary NAZA

NAZA, a new documentary by Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham and filmmaker Rachel Szor, presents serious allegations about Israeli military operations in Gaza.

Top Jewelers in Miami: 8 Shops Worth Visiting in 2026

From iced-out moissanite chains to handmade gold Cuban links and rare signed jewels, eight Miami jewelers worth a visit this year.

How Buy Now, Pay Later Debt Changes Your Bankruptcy Decisions

Does buy now, pay later debt count when you're deciding whether to file for bankruptcy? More and more, yes, even when the balance never touched your credit report. Split-pay loans from apps like Klarna, Afterpay, Affirm, and Zip have become

The Debt Collector’s AI Voice Agent: How Synthetic-Voice Dunning Calls Are Colliding With Decades-Old Consumer Protection Rules

Most consumers assume the friendly voice on a collection call belongs to a person following a script. It is often a script following a person. A synthetic voice, cloned or generated by an AI agent, working a call list on behalf of a collect

The Black Box in the Crossover: What Vehicle Event Data Recorders Capture in the Seconds Before a Fatal Pedestrian Crash

A pedestrian killed by a crossover has, on average, about 20 seconds of the driver's inputs sitting inside the car that hit them. Throttle position. Brake pressure. Steering angle. Whether the seat belt was buckled and whether stability con

Related Articles

Popular Categories