How Was The ‘AGW’ Theory Disproven?

‘IPCC’ Denials in AGW

Geoscientist Jeff Severinghaus(Scripps Institution of Oceanography) claims findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is “unequivocal,” and insists there’s a 95% chance human-created CO2 is the culprit. Strangely, it never denies natural occurrences are big factors.

He trots out the usual meme “Ninety-seven percent of scientists … [have] acknowledged the planet is warming and human activity is contributing to it.” But the Severinghaus survey states only 0.3% (of 11,944 scientists) said humans were responsible for half of “current” AGW.

Lp supercell cloud AGW.
In LP supercells the updraft is on the rear flank of the storm, a barber pole or corkscrew appearance of updraft is possible, precipitation sparse or well removed from the updraft, often is transparent and you cant see it, and large hail is often difficult to discern visually. Also, there is no hook seen on Doppler radar. [18 April 2011] Any strange weather such as this is always blamed on AGW..
Last week, United Nations (UN) released its formal report on climate change, which interprets data from the IPCC report.

It’s a ‘given’, no current warming has occurred. No scientists said any alleged AGW would be catastrophic. Knowing the long, natural 1,500-year climate cycle which gave us the Little Ice Age, Medieval Warming, and more than 600 previous warming/cooling cycles over the past million years, one realizes global climate is constantly cycling. But always within natural parameters.

Weather obeys dictates of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation-PDO (Pacific Ocean)-our biggest heat sink. The pacific’s 60-year warm/cool cycle, when superimposed on the 1,500-year cycle of the PDO, currently predicts continued global cooling.

Mark Morano Quotes

  • MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen Rips UN IPCC Report: ‘The latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence’
  • ‘It is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going’
  • Climate Scientist Dr. John Christy: 73 UN Climate Models Wrong, No Global Warming in 17 Years.
  • Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN ‘IPCC’ Climate Report

‘IPCC’ Contains No Science

One must understand ‘IPCC’ is a political entity, not scientific. Morano: “You have to pity the UN … both poles have expanding ice, with the Antarctic breaking all time records, global temperatures have failed to rise for 15 plus years, global cooling has occurred since 2002, polar bear numbers are increasing, … sea level rise is failing to accelerate, tornadoes are at record lows, hurricanes are at record low activity, former climate believers … are growing more skeptical by the day … the UN ‘IPCC,’ simply a political body masquerading a scientific group.”

The ‘IPCC’ meeting was not even televised. Scientific truth cannot be negotiated in the ‘dead of night’. Most scientists find AGW greatly exaggerated-so small as to be submerged in background variability of natural climate. ‘IPCC’ predicted less Antarctic ice, and seem shocked its ice is increasing. Earth gained record sea ice in 2013-size equivalent to 19,000 ‘Manhattans’-the largest increase on record.

All ‘IPCC’ models completely dismiss sun influences. Amazingly, all 65 climate models used by ‘IPCC’ for CO2 prediction (with climate) did not incorporate the 17-year cooling trend.

Even NATURE gives 3 explanations for the halt in global warming (not AGW): 1) solar activity, 2) stratospheric water vapor, and 3) El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle.

Obama Decides To Bypass Government

From Boulder (Co), Gina McCarthy (EPA Chief) stated Obama stopped waiting on Congress to act on climate change, and will bypass the legislative branch to develop their own response. “Essentially, he said that it is time to act. And he said he wasn’t going to wait for Congress … .”

With AGW, it’s an all-or-nothing shot. It seems obvious AGW has always been a non-entity, but the ‘Dems’ want to ride this horse until it collapses.

In January (2013) Mark Koba (CNBC)-a typical AGW supporter-discussed how price of climate change would keep rising [Fighting Climate Change Could Come at a High Price –]. World Economic Forum quoted it could cost $700 billion/yr for nations to reduce CO2 production (U.S./China)-the main AGW purported culprits. If this carries, we’re talking more than just insult to injury.

German news magazine “Der Spiegel” states Top scientists call into question UN’s global warming study – ‘Results have been politicized’. The news magazine also notes only 3 out of 114 models can actually reproduce the existing 17-year lapse in warming. For some reason, this fact was omitted from all UN policymaker/public reports.

Count on the mainstream media to bolster the continued belief in man made global warming (AGW).