Last July 7th, FBI Director James Comey held a news conference to announce his Bureau’s review of the criminal investigation against Democratic presidential nominee and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Although he outlined abuse after abuse of her office as the chief diplomat (2009-13), he astonished the nation by not recommending her criminal indictment.
There was an instantaneous roar of disbelief that thundered through every town in America. Hillary got away with it as no other American could have, was the generic outcry.
Now in a recent review of James Comey’s previous and current business relationships, the FBI Director had deep personal and professional ties to the Clinton Foundation that posed a significant conflict of interest. Those who couldn’t believe their ears when the bi-partisan director failed to recommend indictment now are beginning to understand why.
The findings reinforce the rumors that Comey was in the tank with Clinton long before he made his findings public. It was due to fact that he is entrenched in big-money nepotism with Washington’s elite.
Breitbart.com reported their findings were focused on the on millions of dollars that Comey accepted from a Clinton Foundation defense contractor, Comey’s former membership on a Clinton Foundation corporate partners board, and his surprising financial relationship with his brother Peter Comey, who works at the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.
Furthermore, when President Obama nominated Comey to become FBI director in 2013, Comey promised the United States Senate that he would recuse himself on all cases involving former employers. Clearly he violated that pledge. In fact, Comey earned $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin just so happened to become a Clinton Foundation donor that very year.
How is that relevant? Comey served as deputy attorney general under John Ashcroft for two years of the Bush administration. He then became the vice president as acting counsel for Lockheed Martin. In his last year at Lockheed Martin (2010), Comey made more than $6 million in compensation. While there, he was also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.
Was it just a coincidence that in that very year of 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department? Comey’s resume moves along to his holdings in the London bank HSBC Holdings. In 2013, he became a director and Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member.
HSBC records show, Mr. Comey’s appointment will be for an initial three-year term which, subject to re-election by shareholders, will expire at the conclusion of the 2016 Annual General Meeting. The bank/holdings outfit, through their philanthropic branches partnered with the Clinton Foundation regularly.
One such instance was when HSBC Holdings partnered with Deutsche Bank through the Clinton Foundation to retrofit 1,500 to 2,500 housing units, primarily in the low- to moderate-income sector in New York City. It should be noted that Retrofitting refers to a Green initiative to conserve energy in commercial housing units. Clinton Foundation records show that the Foundation projected $1 billion in financing for this Green initiative to conserve people’s energy in low-income housing units.
Then there is the Peter Comey situation. Breitbart reports that when their source called the Chinatown offices of D.C. law firm DLA Piper and asked for Peter Comey, a receptionist immediately put him through to Comey’s direct line. They noted that Peter Comey is not even listed on the DLA Piper website. He was supposedly the Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas for DLA Piper. James Comey was not questioned about his relationship with Peter Comey in his confirmation hearing.
And what is DLA Piper? They were the firm that performed the independent audit of the Clinton Foundation in November during Clinton-Worlds first big push to put the email scandal behind them. DLA Piper’s employees taken as a whole represent a major Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign donation bloc and Clinton Foundation donation base. They were number five on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list, just ahead of Goldman Sachs, a Wall Street firm she has refused to publicly release her taped speeches to at $250,000 per time.
As for Peter Comey, the mortgage on his house is owned by his brother James Comey, the FBI director. Breitbart News produced records that show Peter Comey bought a $950,000 house in Vienna, Virginia, in June 2008. He needed a $712,500 mortgage from First Savings Mortgage Corporation. In early 2011, James Comey and his wife stepped in to become Private Party lenders. They granted a mortgage on the house for $711,000. Financial records suggest that Peter Comey took out two such mortgages from his brother that day.
Did James Comey and Peter Comey speak at any point about this mortgage or anything else during the Clinton email investigation?
There are too many questions without answers. Others include the Re-design of the FBI Building, Procon Consulting, Leasecorp, SpaceLogik and Leasecorp. The question is, would the mainstream media be investigating Donald Trump with this sort of investigation if all of the above was related to him?
The main question is: Why did the FBI not?indict Hillary Clinton, when others have been severely punished for less?
