Obama’s Charitable Tax Proposal Will Cut Charitable Giving

The last thing nonprofits want is government meddling in charitable tax deductions, but that is exactly what Barack Obama is doing.

Obama’s proposal Monday, to limit the value of the charitable tax deduction for high-income contributors is like trolling in dark waters. By some estimates, charitable giving could be slashed by almost $10 billion per year. In his attack on the wealthy, he will probably end up hurting those that charity is meant to aid.

Obama had already asked Congress to limit the deductible value of charitable gift deductions to 28 percent. By comparison, this year’s top tax rate is 39.6 percent for those with taxable income of at least $464,850.

The administration’s tortured reasoning is to “make the tax code more equitable” because the value of the tax deduction is proportional to one’s tax bracket. White House spokesman said the reason is that “it is less valuable to those in the lower brackets.”

Huh?

Howard Husock, VP for policy research at the Manhattan Institute, writing at Forbes.com, says the proposed limit is likely to have a negative and possibly unforeseen (by the administration) effect.

howard husock
Howard Husock speaking about the effect of the proposed tax code change

Husock also cited research that shows in one recent year, only 2.6 percent of American households had an adjusted gross income of more than $200,000. These same households account for 25.1 percent of all income and 29.5 percent of the total value of charitable donations made by all households.

Could it be the administration is more interested in bringing down all incomes to a low base level than in making Americans more prosperous?

Certainly, they appear to prefer hurting the wealthy than helping the poor.

Husock says the new rules amount to “a tax increase on such giving.” He says it would “not surprisingly, reduce charity overall.” Husock also says that economist Arthur Brooks, head of the American Enterprise Institute, estimated the decline at around $9.4 billion, out of annual donations of some $220 billion.

It isn’t clear what the Obama administration is really trying to do, but it if they are trying to reduce charitable giving, they have hit the target.

Wealthy Americans are not the only ones this would affect. Lower-income Americans would also be affected, as well.

Around 80 percent of high-income donors contribute to organizations providing for the “basic needs” of the poor in education, healthcare, the economy, and other areas.

Obama’s proposal would have a direct effect on those contributions.

Congratulations – the administration hits a bullseye and devastates struggling charities!

Hot this week

Did David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?

Dr. Omerbashich says the Royal Swedish Academy is a Crime Scene and he has the proof that Nobel laureates stole his discovery.

New Approaches to Disaster Relief Challenges

Disaster relief has always been a challenge. NASA, Google,...

3 Legitimate Money Making Methods to Supplement Your Income

In a perfect world, when your landlord raises your...

2016 Predictions by World Renowned Medium and Psychic Lindy Baker

World renowned medium and psychic Lindy Baker is interviewed by The Hollywood Sentinel, discussing psychic power, the spirit world, life after death, areas of concern in 2016, and much more.

Digital Coupon Customers Spending More Than Double At Stores

A new study shows that customers who use digital coupons go shopping more for groceries and other household goods more often and spend more on their shopping trips.

Eduardo Padron Prado: The Engineer Who Learned to Adapt Before Trying to Optimize

Eduardo Padron Prado has spent more than twenty years working with machines, processes, and systems, always driven by the same question: why isn't something working as well as it should? A cable rolling mill in Venezuela that required a bet

Beyond the Trade: How Web Innovations Helped a Tradesman of 25+ Years Build a Second Income Stream

For more than twenty-five years, he showed up. Early mornings, long days, the kind of physical work that doesn't care how you're feeling when the alarm goes off. He was good at what he did, and he still is. But somewhere in his early fiftie

The Shameful Documentary NAZA

NAZA, a new documentary by Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham and filmmaker Rachel Szor, presents serious allegations about Israeli military operations in Gaza.

Top Jewelers in Miami: 8 Shops Worth Visiting in 2026

From iced-out moissanite chains to handmade gold Cuban links and rare signed jewels, eight Miami jewelers worth a visit this year.

How Buy Now, Pay Later Debt Changes Your Bankruptcy Decisions

Does buy now, pay later debt count when you're deciding whether to file for bankruptcy? More and more, yes, even when the balance never touched your credit report. Split-pay loans from apps like Klarna, Afterpay, Affirm, and Zip have become

The Debt Collector’s AI Voice Agent: How Synthetic-Voice Dunning Calls Are Colliding With Decades-Old Consumer Protection Rules

Most consumers assume the friendly voice on a collection call belongs to a person following a script. It is often a script following a person. A synthetic voice, cloned or generated by an AI agent, working a call list on behalf of a collect

The Black Box in the Crossover: What Vehicle Event Data Recorders Capture in the Seconds Before a Fatal Pedestrian Crash

A pedestrian killed by a crossover has, on average, about 20 seconds of the driver's inputs sitting inside the car that hit them. Throttle position. Brake pressure. Steering angle. Whether the seat belt was buckled and whether stability con

When the CFO Leaves: How Growing Companies Keep the Books on Track

Most owners assume a CFO exit is mainly an HR headache. Post the job, run the search, backfill the seat. The seat is the easy part. What breaks first is the reporting cadence: the month-end close nobody owns, the covenant calculation that u

Related Articles

Popular Categories