Obama’s Charitable Tax Proposal Will Cut Charitable Giving

The last thing nonprofits want is government meddling in charitable tax deductions, but that is exactly what Barack Obama is doing.

Obama’s proposal Monday, to limit the value of the charitable tax deduction for high-income contributors is like trolling in dark waters. By some estimates, charitable giving could be slashed by almost $10 billion per year. In his attack on the wealthy, he will probably end up hurting those that charity is meant to aid.

Obama had already asked Congress to limit the deductible value of charitable gift deductions to 28 percent. By comparison, this year’s top tax rate is 39.6 percent for those with taxable income of at least $464,850.

The administration’s tortured reasoning is to “make the tax code more equitable” because the value of the tax deduction is proportional to one’s tax bracket. White House spokesman said the reason is that “it is less valuable to those in the lower brackets.”

Huh?

Howard Husock, VP for policy research at the Manhattan Institute, writing at Forbes.com, says the proposed limit is likely to have a negative and possibly unforeseen (by the administration) effect.

howard husock
Howard Husock speaking about the effect of the proposed tax code change

Husock also cited research that shows in one recent year, only 2.6 percent of American households had an adjusted gross income of more than $200,000. These same households account for 25.1 percent of all income and 29.5 percent of the total value of charitable donations made by all households.

Could it be the administration is more interested in bringing down all incomes to a low base level than in making Americans more prosperous?

Certainly, they appear to prefer hurting the wealthy than helping the poor.

Husock says the new rules amount to “a tax increase on such giving.” He says it would “not surprisingly, reduce charity overall.” Husock also says that economist Arthur Brooks, head of the American Enterprise Institute, estimated the decline at around $9.4 billion, out of annual donations of some $220 billion.

It isn’t clear what the Obama administration is really trying to do, but it if they are trying to reduce charitable giving, they have hit the target.

Wealthy Americans are not the only ones this would affect. Lower-income Americans would also be affected, as well.

Around 80 percent of high-income donors contribute to organizations providing for the “basic needs” of the poor in education, healthcare, the economy, and other areas.

Obama’s proposal would have a direct effect on those contributions.

Congratulations – the administration hits a bullseye and devastates struggling charities!

Hot this week

Did David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?

Dr. Omerbashich says the Royal Swedish Academy is a Crime Scene and he has the proof that Nobel laureates stole his discovery.

New Approaches to Disaster Relief Challenges

Disaster relief has always been a challenge. NASA, Google,...

3 Legitimate Money Making Methods to Supplement Your Income

In a perfect world, when your landlord raises your...

2016 Predictions by World Renowned Medium and Psychic Lindy Baker

World renowned medium and psychic Lindy Baker is interviewed by The Hollywood Sentinel, discussing psychic power, the spirit world, life after death, areas of concern in 2016, and much more.

Digital Coupon Customers Spending More Than Double At Stores

A new study shows that customers who use digital coupons go shopping more for groceries and other household goods more often and spend more on their shopping trips.

Recycling will Soon Change in the EU Forever

Packaging is about to change forever. In the European Union, rules and regulations are being put into place to further a sustainable future for recycling. Along with regulations being added, a grading system will be added as well. Using the

From Luxury Cars to Rush Hour: Staying Safe on Miami Roads

There will always be inherent dangers in getting behind...

Why Is The DNA Company Bringing Behavior Change Into Genetic Education?

Why is The DNA Company adding behavior-change training to DNA University? The answer lies in turning genetic insights into practical action.

How JP Morgan’s Justin Nelson Ties Giving to Estate Plans

Ask a wealthy family how they plan to divide an estate, and the conversation used to stop at percentages: how much to each child, how much to the grandchildren, how much to charity if anything is left over. That conversation has changed. Fo

Bestselling Author Chris Sund Finds 92% of Adults Believe They Are Capable of More

His survey of more than 200 working adults points to a gap that has little to do with talent, and a personal mission to help people close it.

How White-Collar Cases Now Begin With a Document Request, Not a Knock at the Door

A federal grand jury subpoena shows up in the CFO's inbox, addressed to the company, asking for three years of emails, wire records, and board decks. The case is already underway. Nobody kicked in a door. No agent flashed a badge in the lob

The Stokes Interview Is Back: Here’s What Couples Must Decide

Two years ago, plenty of marriage-based green card couples never sat across a desk from a USCIS officer. Interview waivers were common, files moved on paperwork, and the second, split-room interview known as a Stokes was a rare escalation r

Related Articles

Popular Categories