Divorce and The Pitfalls of Social Media

A majority of adults in the United States are using social media and a significant number are getting divorced.

New research indicating that approximately 78% of adults use Snapchat, 71% use Instagram, close to half use Twitter, and over two-thirds use Facebook on a regular basis. Meanwhile, about 40 to 50 percent of first time married couples in the United States get divorce, and the numbers are much higher for couples in second and third marriages. With these staggering numbers, it is no surprise that social media use and divorce are intertwined in many aspects.

While social media platforms often play a role in a relationship crumbling and a couple choosing to get divorced, it is also a common practice for divorce and family law attorneys to use information obtained from social media platforms once the couple are already in court.

Posts, photos, and social media records are examples of evidence gleaned from social media platforms that is admissible in divorce court. The information is legally permissible as evidence in court if it was obtained legally. For example, posts with privacy setting set to public enable the general public to view the posts and these are therefore admissible as evidence. Alternatively, if a social media friend or follower legitimately shared a post they are able to view and it was discovered by the other side, this too may be used in court.

A survey conducted by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) revealed that four out of every five divorce attorney incorporate evidence obtained from Facebook and other social networking platforms into their cases. Inappropriate, negative, incriminating or inflammatory posts and photos that reflect poorly on the partner or which a judge may consider to be objectionable could influence rulings on child custody and parenting time, alimony, division of assets and more, according to Erlich Law Office, LLC.

Since images and posts from social media can have severe ramifications in court, affecting such critical matters as child custody, division of assets and more, attorneys will usually advise their clients to be very prudent and steer clear of venting their emotions and complaints on social media platforms such as Facebook. To limit the potential for damage even further, many divorce attorneys will recommend that their clients either temporarily shut down their social media accounts or highly limit the privacy settings so that posts cannot be viewed and shared other than by a trusted group of close friends and family.

While these measures may sound extreme or unnecessary, in the digital age it only takes one photo or post, discovered by the opposing side, to dramatically change the course of a divorce case, so it is better to be safe than sorry.

Hot this week

Did David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?

Dr. Omerbashich says the Royal Swedish Academy is a Crime Scene and he has the proof that Nobel laureates stole his discovery.

New Approaches to Disaster Relief Challenges

Disaster relief has always been a challenge. NASA, Google,...

3 Legitimate Money Making Methods to Supplement Your Income

In a perfect world, when your landlord raises your...

2016 Predictions by World Renowned Medium and Psychic Lindy Baker

World renowned medium and psychic Lindy Baker is interviewed by The Hollywood Sentinel, discussing psychic power, the spirit world, life after death, areas of concern in 2016, and much more.

Digital Coupon Customers Spending More Than Double At Stores

A new study shows that customers who use digital coupons go shopping more for groceries and other household goods more often and spend more on their shopping trips.

The Exercise Paradox: Why the Physics of Weight Loss Defies the Treadmill

The global fitness and diet industry operates on a foundational piece of arithmetic but the physics of weight loss doesn't operate they say they say it does.

When The Garage Is The Only Step Free Door Into The House

When the garage is the only door your mother...

Will Birthright Citizenship Become Next Historic Roe VS Wade? Trump Lost Fight; But Re-issued Executive Order Targeting Birth Tourism

Despite losing the U.S. Supreme Court birthright citizenship fight almost two months ago, President Trump reloaded and fired off another round of ammunition to let the Supreme Court know there is more than one way to skin a cat.

ClickHouse and Hud Target a New Bottleneck in AI Development: Knowing What to Ship

The rise of coding agents is changing where software...

Installing Solar Before The Roof Costs Homeowners Twice

How old is the roof under those panels? Hardly...

Two Retirements Turned A Weld Cell Into A Rework Department

Two welders retired inside twelve months. Two decades of...

Related Articles

Popular Categories