The liberals have a favorite word to silence their opposition; racist. There are many more that sail from their mouths at regular intervals such as “compassion” and “intolerance.” But what is one to think about the latest public revelations by former First Lady Michelle Obama?
Michelle Obama Says White Men Are To Blame
Apparently she has America’s distrust of politics all figured out. Her theory is it’s because the Republican Party is full of white men. This is not a misprint. It is all because of white men.
Will there be outrage in the media for her being:
- Not compassionate
- And here’s another buzz word of the left to add on; “not inclusive.”
Speaking at the Pennsylvania Conference for Women Tuesday, the wife of former President Barack Obama said, “We should be working actively to mix it up, so we’re getting a real broad range of perspectives on every issue.”
Fair enough. There is nothing wrong with that statement. But there is so much more. Remember, “compassionate, inclusive, racist, intolerant.”
Ms. Obama went on to profile Washington’s binary political system. She made it crystal clear about her own personal attitude about Republicans. Remember, that one word, “Republican,” constitutes millions of Americans.
She said, “At the State of the Union address, when you are in the room what you can see is this real dichotomy. It’s a feeling of color almost. On one side of the room is literally gray and white. Literally, that is the color palette on one side of the room. On the other side of the room, there are yellows and blues and whites and greens. Physically, there’s a difference in color, in the tone, because on one side all men, all white, on the other side some women, some people of color.”
The Intolerance of Michelle Obama
Had this been former First Lady Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan, would the liberal press have ignored their comments if similarly describing Democrats? Of course not. Remember, “compassionate, tolerant, inclusive and not racist?” But not Michelle Obama for heaven’s sake.
The former First Lady appeared oblivious to the contradiction of touting broad perspectives while judging people solely according to race. That would not be “compassionate, inclusive or tolerant,” right?
I was planning to ask if this annoys anyone besides this columnist, but this video answers that question.