Fired for Working Overtime?

Eliminating overtime is a practical way for employers to control and reduce payroll costs. However, employers cannot fire employees for requesting payment for an overtime claim. This is due to a law under the Fair Labor Standards Act, stating that it is against federal law to retaliate against an employee for bringing an overtime claim or asserting any other rights established by the Act.

According to the United States Department of Labor, employees covered by the Act must receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a workweek at a rate of at least time and one-half their regular rate of pay. It does not require overtime pay for working on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays unless overtime is worked on those days. Normally, overtime pay earned in a particular week must be paid on the regular payday for the pay period in which the wages were earned.

Common overtime claims may include:

  • Employers mistakenly treating employees as “exempt” from the Act’s overtime requirements
  • Employers failing to identify, record, or compensate “off-the-clock” hours spent by employees performing compensable, job-related duties
  • Employers failing to include “wage arguments” such as longevity pay when calculating an employee’s overtime rate

The Act states that an employer must pay an employee for overtime worked, even if the employer did not approve the overtime. Note that in this situation, the employer may have a discipline policy for disregarding rules and/or authority, but they cannot retaliate for an employee simply requesting payment for their hours worked.

If an employer dismisses an employee with an unlawful motive, they are in violation of the law. An employer cannot fire an employee for bringing an overtime claim against them. According to the Act, “Where the immediate cause or motivating factor of a discharge is an employee’s assertion of rights under the Act, the discharge is discriminatory whether or not other grounds for discharge exist.”

Additionally, the employer is legally unable to retaliate in any of the following ways:

  • Demoting an employee
  • Reducing hours or responsibilities
  • Changing job titles
  • Assigning unusual labor, menial tasks, or “dirty jobs”
  • Withholding resources necessary to do the job
  • Poor treatment compared to other employees

In order to prove that the employer has illegally retaliated against an employee, evidence must be gathered. How quickly the retaliation occurred after the employee’s action is often a strong indicator of motive. For example, if an employee requests payment for an overtime claim and they are fired shortly thereafter, there is a better can for retaliation than if they are fired months after the fact. Additionally, the employer’s history of similar actions, their initial response to the employee’s complaint, and other indicating factors can be used for proof in a claim.

In some cases, punitive damages could also be awarded to the employee. These damages are intended to punish the employer for their inappropriate and illegal actions.

Hot this week

Did David Wineland and Serge Haroche Steal Idea For The Nobel Physics Prize?

Dr. Omerbashich says the Royal Swedish Academy is a Crime Scene and he has the proof that Nobel laureates stole his discovery.

New Approaches to Disaster Relief Challenges

Disaster relief has always been a challenge. NASA, Google,...

3 Legitimate Money Making Methods to Supplement Your Income

In a perfect world, when your landlord raises your...

2016 Predictions by World Renowned Medium and Psychic Lindy Baker

World renowned medium and psychic Lindy Baker is interviewed by The Hollywood Sentinel, discussing psychic power, the spirit world, life after death, areas of concern in 2016, and much more.

Digital Coupon Customers Spending More Than Double At Stores

A new study shows that customers who use digital coupons go shopping more for groceries and other household goods more often and spend more on their shopping trips.

How JP Morgan’s Justin Nelson Ties Giving to Estate Plans

Ask a wealthy family how they plan to divide an estate, and the conversation used to stop at percentages: how much to each child, how much to the grandchildren, how much to charity if anything is left over. That conversation has changed. Fo

Bestselling Author Chris Sund Finds 92% of Adults Believe They Are Capable of More

His survey of more than 200 working adults points to a gap that has little to do with talent, and a personal mission to help people close it.

How White-Collar Cases Now Begin With a Document Request, Not a Knock at the Door

A federal grand jury subpoena shows up in the CFO's inbox, addressed to the company, asking for three years of emails, wire records, and board decks. The case is already underway. Nobody kicked in a door. No agent flashed a badge in the lob

The Stokes Interview Is Back: Here’s What Couples Must Decide

Two years ago, plenty of marriage-based green card couples never sat across a desk from a USCIS officer. Interview waivers were common, files moved on paperwork, and the second, split-room interview known as a Stokes was a rare escalation r

Bloom Security Finds a Software Supply Chain Risk Hiding in AI Coding Workflows

AI coding agents are increasingly capable of selecting dependencies,...

The Real Gaza – Not NAZA – Story

Israeli soldiers in Naza: The Real Story describe Hamas tunnels, weapons in homes, civilian disguises and control of Gaza aid.

The Truth Behind Those “Miracle” Plug-In Electricity Savers

Are "Miracle" Plug-In Electricity Savers really the miracle the marketing says they are? Is there any truth in it, or is it a scam?

Related Articles

Popular Categories