Daily News header

Obama Must Ring 'Enough' for Israel-Palestine's Raging War

By

Just as in 2008 when Barack Obama verbalized with a yell of "enough" what was echoing in the hearts of millions of Americans as the nation was engaged in two raging wars and caught in a freefalling economy, the Israelis and Palestinians desperately now need to hear an equally powerful statement from the American President, backed up by his publicly endorsing parameters for peace.

The confluence of events - an Israeli onslaught in Gaza at the very moment when the United Nations General Assembly votes on Palestine's membership status - could launch Iran to be an arbiter in Palestinian unity and political positions with Israel, at a time when global Palestinian sympathy could be higher than ever. The United States cannot allow Iran to be seen among Arab publics as the best defender of Palestinian people against Israel because the resulting radicalization of all sides could tear the region apart.

The U.S. is again facing the uncomfortable prospect of standing nearly alone with Israel among the community of nations, likely vetoing later this month a U.N. resolution whose very principles of Palestinian sovereignty the U.S. fundamentally supports. Considering the current military escalations, the United States should probably also count on soon having to vote against another resolution condemning Israeli violence and Palestinian civilian deaths. If no visible progress has been achieved toward peace, the result will likely be further isolation of the U.S. and Israel, and this in turn will likely result in the two countries squarely the publics' target in the Arab Spring. If this were to happen, the world can see ahead what it rues: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict becoming the flashpoint for an open and violent clash of civilizations.

This is a moment of truth in U.S.-Israeli relations, and the United States must now chart a "third-way" where its special relationship with Israel remains untouched from what it must now boldly do to advance peace and deter war. To stop the Palestinian cause of freedom from falling into the Iranian lap, limit the regional fallout from any future strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, and reduce the momentum of war in the Arab Spring region, President Obama should travel to Jerusalem and Ramallah, before his inauguration, and present directly to the people a vision for Israeli-Palestinian peace, the terms of which are based on inescapable realities that the parties have already agreed to at different times in the past and would inevitably be in any future agreement: 1) two states along the 1967 borders with land swaps, 2) a united and shared capital of Jerusalem, and 3) the non-allowance of the right of return other than for the tens of thousands of Palestinians to re-unite families, with compensation for Palestinians instead in its place.

By doing this, President Obama will at once win the hearts and minds of both publics - as being a vanguard of Jewish identity and Palestinian historic legitimacy, outlining what each side can minimally accept and the most they could give to end their conflict. Regarding the right of return, the Israeli government - compelled to make peace rather than face the demographic consequences of annexing the Palestinian territories - would never therefore agree, as a matter of safeguarding the Jewish majority and identity of the state, to the repatriation of all the Palestinians displaced by war. The president should clearly connect the parameters for peace as fully emblematic of the Arab Peace Initiative and the other frameworks of Israel's peace with Jordan and Egypt and the interim agreements with the Palestinians.

In Ramallah, rather than first defining a unified stance on Israel, the U.S. president should also speak about an alternative approach to Palestinian unity: to instead focus on their current, new system of government based on their identity as a people - one that reflects how they see themselves 100 or 200 years from now, beyond the immediate wrenching conflict. Prior to its rise to power, Hamas in Gaza was known for its decentralized delivery of human services. The Fayyad plan in the West Bank emphasizes decentralization to build political and economic self-reliance by increasing local control.

Decentralized public administrations align with advancing sustainable human development, which provides freedom from economic and political domination and price fluctuations. Palestinian factional governments could find common ground while together forming a federalist-decentralized government, basing it on what they have already shown by their actions to be at their core identities: meeting human needs through supporting localized actions. Similarly, during the forming of the United States, individual states would not have joined the union had it not been a federalist-decentralized system.

President Obama's call out to Americans of "enough" resonated and was the right thing to do in its time, so now the president must ring out again, to save Israelis and Palestinians from their own precipice, and the region with them.

Dr. Yossef Ben-Meir is a sociologist working and living in Marrakech, Morocco.
ben-meir@mailcity.com

  Please leave a comment here     If it does not display within 10 seconds, please refresh the page

* The views of Opinion writers do not necessarily reflect the views of NewsBlaze

Related Palestinian News News

Nurit Greenger says Israel finally positioned itself to be stronger than the Arabs and it should cast off the failed Oslo accords the Arabs always ignored.
The flailing, inexperienced president has has built a diplomatic wall between the United States and its most trusted ally in the Middle East
Kimberly Jones talks about the Palestinian - Israeli negotiations where tempers spark as both sides get their feelings hurt.
Alon Ben-Meir looks at the Israeli-Palestinian talks brokered by US Secretary of State, John Kerry, and tells why he doubts that a solution will be reached
In his remarks with US Secretary of State John Kerry in Jerusalem, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the issue by saying that Israel is committed to advance peace with the Palestinians. However, the Palestinians are acting otherwise
In a joint statement with US Secretary John Kerry in Jerusalem, Prime Minister Netanyahu said Israel-Palestine negotiation is a peace that Israel can and must be able to defend itself, by itself, with its own forces against any foreseeable threat.

 

NewsBlaze Writers Of The Month



Popular Stories This Month

newsletter logo

NewsBlaze
Copyright © 2004-2014 NewsBlaze Pty. Ltd.
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice               Press Room   |    Visit NewsBlaze Mobile Site