Daily News logo Newsletter logo   Search News    

U. S. Supreme Court Considers C. J. Ford's Investigation as one of the Issues in Death Row Inmate can Fire Counsel

  Share This Story

The Supreme Court will consider Clair's previous counsel's failure to analyze and submit newly discovered evidence by C. J. FORD as a factor in their decision

The capital case Martell v. Clair was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2011. Clair had been convicted of a murder in 1987 and sentenced to death. The issue brought to the Supreme Court was whether a convicted inmate could fire his appointed counsel and get new counsel. One of the issues that Kenneth Clair's attorneys brought to the court as justification for firing former counsel was that counsel did not pursue newly discovered physical evidence in his federal Habeas Corpus appeal.

Evidence was bought to the attention of the court in the appeal by means of a letter by Clair, and a investigative report by C. J. Ford Jr., Clair's private investigator. The issue of whether Clair's former counsel could be fired because Clair's attorneys failed to introduce or examine this evidence, escalated this case and this issue to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the defense argued on Clair's behalf.

In that respondent's brief, in regards to Ford's investigation, the defense said the following:

Clair independently enlisted private investigator C. J. Ford to look into his case. Clair instructed his counsel to cooperate, but the Federal Public Defender (FPD) provided no assistance and, indeed, restricted Ford's efforts. Ford nonetheless was able to locate a potential alibi witness the FPD had never interviewed, and he obtained a declaration from Flore's recanting key portions of her testimony.

On March 16, 2005, Clair wrote to the district court expressing concern that the FPD no longer had his best interest at hand. Meanwhile, Ford continued his investigation. His most significant discoveries concerned the physical evidence that had been collected from the scene of the Rodger's murder. In the early 1990s, one of Clair's original Habeas attorneys had asked to review the evidence, but the police department claimed it had been lost or destroyed. In the ensuing years of litigation, Clair's counsel never probed or challenged that claim. When Ford took the matter up, he learned after persistent inquiry that the police did have the evidence after all. After reviewing that evidence in late May 2005, Ford informed Clair that substantial biological material and fingerprints appeared to be available but that further analysis would be required to determine whether the evidence was in suitable condition for testing or comparison purposes.

On June 16, 2005, Clair wrote to the court to renew his request for new counsel. Clair informed the court that despite Ford's discovery, the FPD was making no effort to analyze the previously missing physical evidence or to present it to the court. Ford submitted his own letter to substantiate Clair's assertion. That letter described Ford's investigation, including his success in locating the physical evidence and the lack of assistance from the FPD. Ford stated that he had found blood, hair, and other physical evidence that needed to be analyzed to determine if it could be subject to DNA testing, and fingerprints that did not belong to Kenneth Clair, the victim, or the owners of the house and, thus, could have belonged to the real perpetrator. Ford said that although he had been trying without success to convince the district attorney's office to analyze the evidence, Clair's attorneys were neither assisting nor investigating themselves.

To find out more about this U.S. Supreme Court case, the investigation, and arguments, See this PDF document and this supreme court document.

Information about C.J. Ford Private Investigations is available at www.cjfordpi.com.

HTML: http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/212398

PDF: http://www.eworldwire.com/pdf/212398.pdf

ONLINE NEWSROOM: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/313164

C. J. Ford Private Investigations
211 S. State College Blvd. #343
Anaheim, CA 92806
PHONE. 714-776-6504
FAX. 714-776-8355
EMAIL: cjfordpi@mac.com
http://www.cjfordpi.com



 
Support Wikipedia

NeswBlaze top writers

Find more stories recommended by Stumbleupon.

newsletter logo

What's Hot?
1 .Supermodel Bar Refaeli Adorns the Cover of the 2009 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue on Newsstands Today! - 101
2 .Breaking News: Cannes Film Festival Awards 2012 - 76
3 .Calling All Military Supporters: a Supporter Needs Your Vote to Win a Grant - 51
4 .Is It Coincidental We Have Another Missing Petite Blonde Coed, Mickey Shunick? - 34
5 .Give a Great Valedictorian Speech - Joey Asher - 33
6 .Round up of iPhone 5 Rumors From the Armenante Apple News Blog - 34
7 .Waterless 'Air Cooler PLUS' Beats Summer's Heat Without Making Your Home Muggy - 38
8 .These 10 Comfortable Walking Shoes Are a Step in the Right Direction - 28
9 .Ethiopia Celebrates Downfall of the Derg Day - 26
10 .Very Young Girls Movie Review: Sex, Class and Ho Daddies - 25
Updated: 13:30 PDT     3475

NewsBlaze Editors

editors

NewsBlaze Writers

news writer images

Writers Wanted

Help NewsBlaze provide daily news, including top stories, Home and Garden, Technology, The Environment and more. NewsBlaze Writer

Follow NewsBlaze

NewsBlaze Social Media Logos NewsBlaze Facebook NewsBlaze LinkedIn NewsBlaze Twitter NewsBlaze YouTube NewsBlaze MySpace NewsBlaze Fan Page NewsBlaze StumbleUpon NewsBlaze Political Cartoons NewsBlaze Editorial Cartoons
NewsBlaze 
Copyright © 2004-2012 NewsBlaze LLC
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice |         Press Room