Daily News header

Was Early Menopause Hormone More Pharma Spin?

By

At the 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Orlando, researchers announced that women who take hormone therapy (HT) are 60 percent more likely to die from lung cancer if they develop it.

But Wyeth's Joseph Camardo, MD didn't let the report curb his enthusiasm for the Prempro franchise. Or the report at a medical conference the previous year that HT doubles risk for breast cancer in five years and increases it in two.

Younger women between aged 51 to 54 are starting to use HT he told reporters and "the same risks may not apply with the new patterns of use!"

HRThorse

For over eight years, hormone makers have tried to revive HT sales which sank in 2002 with a "timing theory." Women shouldn't take less hormones says pharma, they should take more and they should start taking them earlier, goes the theory.

(In Chicago, the timing theory is called voting early and often.)

The women in the Women's Health Initiative who got 29 percent more breast cancer, 26 percent more heart disease, 41 percent more stroke and double the amount of blood clots on Prempro wouldn't have gotten the lethal quartet if they weren't so old, went the theory. Their average age was 63! If women start HT around 50, it well might well prevent heart disease and cognitive decline says the timing theory.

Of course you have to admire pharma's audacity. Despite the HT-caused endometrial cancer epidemic in the 1970s which fell when women quit Premarin, despite the HT-caused breast cancer epidemic which fell when women quit Prempro in 2002, they're sticking to their story gosh darnit. See R.J. Reynolds.

But the evidence for a "timing theory" was nothing more than some Godforsaken ovariectomized primates at Wake Forest and Mount Sinai medical schools behind three security doors, trials at major medical centers conducted by several Wyeth-linked researchers and pharma supplication to Wall Street.

This week new findings in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute show the "timing theory" is as ass backwards as the HT theory, which caused what it supposed to prevent, itself.

An analysis from England's National Health Service Million Woman Study found the women with the greatest risk of breast cancer from hormones are those who took them the earliest -- before or soon after menopause. In other words, women who observed the timing theory. Oops.

0.3 percent of women 50 to 59 who had never taken hormones developed breast cancer a year, 0.46 percent of women who started hormones five or more years after menopause and 0.61 percent of women who started hormone before or less than five years after menopause.

The risk was even increased when early starters used hormones for less than five years.

While the pharma timing theory has no doubt always been about timing of revenue, it enjoys wide press exposure. The Washington Post reprinted a pro-timing theory piece from the "news source" of Massachusetts General Hospital's website where it ran next to a Wyeth-linked doctor's article.

Now the timing theory looks as medically sound as telling people to start smoking earlier.

SOURCE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martha-rosenberg/hormones-still-pushed-sti_b_801540.html

Martha Rosenberg is a columnist and cartoonist, who writes about public health

  Please leave a comment here     If it does not display within 10 seconds, please refresh the page

Related Health News News

Could eating spicy peppers help prevent or slow down some intestinal cancers? A UC San Diego School of Medicine research team investigates.
The deadline for the realization of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by countries of the world is drawing to a close in 2015. The progress on MDGs might have been with mixed results, but lot of lessons need to be learnt while we frame n
In the year 2000, countries of the world had agreed to meet the 8 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015. Numerous consultative processes have been taking place around the world on what should be the development goals post-2015.
Martha Rosenberg investigates a proposal that people watch the animals they eat being killed. Some say it encourages insensitivity and lack of empathy for suffering.
The first estimates of the global burden of TB in children given by the WHO in 2012, suggested that there might be 530,000 children suffering from it. Subsequently there has been an uptake in the research in this field.
We know that nearly one third of the 35 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) have tuberculosis (TB), and 13% of 8.6 million new TB cases every year are HIV positive. Also 1 in 5 HIV associated deaths are due to TB.

 

NewsBlaze Writers Of The Month



Popular Stories This Month

newsletter logo

NewsBlaze
Copyright © 2004-2014 NewsBlaze Pty. Ltd.
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice               Press Room   |    Visit NewsBlaze Mobile Site