Daily News header

The Absurdity of Net Neutrality

By

Congressman Mike Doyle (D-PA) recently endorsed the Federal Communications Commission's proposal to impose network neutrality on private-sector Internet service providers. Doyle says the plan serves the FCC's "congressionally mandated role to protect consumers and promote the public interest."

Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) goes a step further, suggesting net neutrality regulations are the only way "the Internet will remain open and free for everyone who uses it." Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) have made similar statements.

Little wonder so many politicians support net neutrality: It opens the door for them to control the world's single-largest source of information, entertainment, and ideas. And if that's not frightening enough, net neutrality is fundamentally anti-consumer, anti-competition, and anti-market.

Net neutrality would require an ISP to offer its service-bandwidth for Internet access-at a single price, regardless of how much a customer uses. Heavy bandwidth users-people streaming high-definition video or downloading software and movies, for example-would pay no more for the service than customers simply browsing the Web or accessing email. The heavy users would be allowed to slow things down for all other users, without paying more for the privilege.

The absurdity of net neutrality is apparent when you apply it to other businesses:

  • Instead of allowing Old Navy to charge for each piece of clothing it sells, the federal government should require it to charge a flat fee for admission to the store. Ticketholders would be allowed to take as much as they wanted throughout the day.

  • Rather than offering individual entrees at varying prices, or reduced-price menus for kids and seniors, Perkins restaurants should be required to offer only single-price buffets. Diners would be required to pay the same price regardless of how much they eat.

  • DirecTV should be required to offer all channels to all subscribers, for a single price. Subscribers who don't watch sports, foreign films, or adult entertainment should pay the same monthly fee as those who do.

  • Barnes & Noble should be required to sell every book ever published. Storeowners should not be permitted to control what's available to their patrons by failing to stock some books.
  • Why do some politicians support such obvious foolishness? Kelly Cobb of Americans for Tax Reform says, "When the first of such regulatory steps tap into the very spine of the Internet-the networks on which everything else depends-that opens the door for further regulation and government intrusion."

    Net neutrality wrests power not from ISPs, but from the consumers they serve. Under a net neutrality regime, ISPs must obey the rules and regulations established by the federal government, rather than responding to consumer preferences in the marketplace.

    Network neutrality is a major shift of power from individual consumers to the federal government. Little wonder high-ranking government officials support it.

    Marc Oestreich (moestreich@heartland.org) is telecommunications legislative specialist for The Heartland Institute.

      Please leave a comment here     If it does not display within 10 seconds, please refresh the page

    * The views of Opinion writers do not necessarily reflect the views of NewsBlaze

    Related Opinions News

    Can terrorists take the statement of loss of rockets to Iron Dome?
    The first estimates of the global burden of TB in children given by the WHO in 2012, suggested that there might be 530,000 children suffering from it. Subsequently there has been an uptake in the research in this field.
    Maliki, the disaster, played for time, accused President Fuad Masum of violating the constitution, and withdrew only under huge pressure by former allies.
    Ronnie McBrayer remembers harsh words spoken by a preacher with a hard heart - all fire and brimstone, but no compassion - and he doesn't accept them.
    Everything in this universe functions under law and remains secure until its time expires and like man it moves elsewhere. Most laws in any government or in a kingdom are based upon the laws set forth with and under Gods laws.
    This God is no imaginary Wizard. He is a compassionate, loving, heart-sick parent who refused to keep his distance from us, who decided he would no longer allow his name or his reputation to be misrepresented

     

    NewsBlaze Writers Of The Month



    Popular Stories This Month

    newsletter logo

    NewsBlaze
    Copyright © 2004-2014 NewsBlaze Pty. Ltd.
    Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice               Press Room   |    Visit NewsBlaze Mobile Site