Published: June 23, 2010
Statewide Alliance Fears Short-Sighted Proposal to Tax Alcohol Will Hurt Hard-Working San Franciscans
SAN FRANCISCO - (BUSINESS WIRE) - Today, San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos (District 11) announced the
City's intent to pursue a job-killing alcohol "mitigation fee" to fund a
grab-bag of health and criminal justice costs at the expense of San
Francisco's hospitality industry. With this fee, Supervisors hope to
recoup approximately $17 million in alleged recovery costs to offset the
City and County's alcohol-related spending. A non-publicly disclosed
nexus study attempting to demonstrate the connection between a range of
municipal costs and alcohol sales in San Francisco is referenced within
the legislation. As of presstime, the study has not been released for
further scrutiny.
"Waiters, bartenders, servers and employees, will bear the brunt of this
proposal," said Jon Gasparini owner of 15 Romolo, Rosewood and
Rye Restaurants in San Francisco.
The proposed alcohol fee would be imposed at the point of wholesale,
which would then be passed on to restaurants, bars, and hotels and
ultimately, to consumers. These higher costs will lead to reduced sales,
which will ultimately result in reduced wages and health care benefits,
job cuts and higher prices for consumers.
The City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors have already
shown their lack of support for the biggest industry in town by voting
to support state legislation to tax alcoholic beverages (AB 1019). This
new fee would be in addition to tax increases proposed at the state
level.
Advocating for a City-level alcohol fee, on top of additional state
alcohol fees, will hurt small business owners, hospitality workers and
consumers in San Francisco. A high percentage of hospitality jobs in San
Francisco are held by women, minorities, and people without a college
education - a group already negatively impacted by the bad economy and
local jobs drying up. Restaurants, hotels and bars and their employees
have been among the hardest hit by the economic crisis and simply cannot
afford to absorb the huge costs brought on by new drink fees.
The proposed "fee" is actually a tax in sheep's clothing, allowing the
Supervisors to circumvent voter approval of an additional tax on
alcohol, and instead only secure the approval of their fellow Board
members by labeling it as a "fee." If enacted, this fee would be another
nail in the coffin of San Francisco's already struggling hospitality
industry. A survey of San Francisco's restaurants shows that most San
Francisco restaurants already reduced employee hours in 2009 and
eliminated employee positions. (Golden Gate Restaurant Association
[GGRA] 2009).
"The way to fund social and education programs is through vibrant local
economy - not through new taxes that will hurt local employers and cost
jobs," concluded Gasparini.
About CAHJ
The California Alliance for Hospitality Jobs (CAHJ) is a coalition of
employers, suppliers, restaurateurs, business owners, trade associations
and citizens who work in and with the hospitality industry and are
concerned about proposals at the federal, state and local levels to
raise alcohol taxes and fees. The alliance is supported by Diageo.

Cerrell Associates
Matt Klink, 323-466-3445
matt@cerrell.com
or
Perry
Communications Group
Kassy Perry, 916-296-8303
kassy@perrycom.com
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News