Published: April 15, 2010
ACLJ: Court Decision Declaring National Day of Prayer Unconstitutional 'Flawed' -- Case Could End up before the Supreme Court
WASHINGTON - (BUSINESS WIRE) - The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) which represented 31
members of Congress in an amicus brief defending the National Day of
Prayer, said today's decision by a federal district court in Wisconsin
declaring the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional is flawed and
expressed confidence that this decision will be overturned.
"It is unfortunate that this court failed to understand that a day set
aside for prayer for the country represents a time-honored tradition
that embraces the First Amendment, not violates it," said Jay Sekulow,
Chief Counsel of the ACLJ. "This decision runs counter to well
established legal precedent and we're confident that this flawed
decision ultimately will be overturned. We will be filing a brief
representing members of Congress challenging this federal district court
decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. If the
appeals court fails to reverse this decision, we're confident the
Supreme Court will hear the case and ultimately determine that such
proclamations and observances like the National Day of Prayer not only
reflect our nation's rich history, but are indeed consistent with the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment."
In a decision released today, U.S. District Judge Barbara B. Crabb
declared the National Day of Prayer unconstitutional. The decision comes
in the case filed by The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), a
Wisconsin-based organization, which challenged the constitutionality of
a 1988 federal law giving the President the authority to designate the
first Thursday in May as a National Day of Prayer.
Sekulow added: "This is the first step in what could be a lengthy legal
process that ultimately puts this issue before the Supreme Court. This
issue could very well be decided by the next appointee to the high
court. An issue like this underscores the importance of why it's so
critical for the nominee to answer direct questions about their judicial
philosophy, how they view the role of judges, and their view of the rule
of law."
In its brief filed with the federal district court in Madison,
Wisconsin, the ACLJ represented itself and 31 members of the 111th
Congress - including Rep. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia, who chairs the
Congressional Prayer Caucus.
The ACLJ represented the following U.S. Representatives who are serving
in the 111th Congress: J. Randy Forbes, Robert B. Aderholt, Michele
Bachmann, Roscoe G. Bartlett, John A. Boehner, John Boozman, Eric
Cantor, K. Michael Conaway, Mary Fallin, Virginia Foxx, Trent Franks,
Scott Garrett, Louie Gohmert, Wally Herger, Peter Hoekstra, Walter B.
Jones, Jim Jordan, Doug Lamborn, Thaddeus G. McCotter, Patrick T.
McHenry, Mike McIntyre, Jeff Miller, Sue Wilkins Myrick, Randy
Neugebauer, Pete Olson, Mike Pence, Joseph R. Pitts, Heath Shuler,
Adrian Smith, Lamar Smith, and Joe Wilson.
The ACLJ brief noted that the country has a long history of recognizing
a national day of prayer dating back to the late 1700's with the
Continental Congress recommending that the states set apart a day for
prayer and thanksgiving. The brief states that "the historical evidence
establishing a National Day of Prayer as deeply embedded in the
tradition and history of this country is indisputable."
The ACLJ amicus brief is available here: http://www.aclj.org/media/pdf/ACLJAmicibrief-Final.pdf
Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and
Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.
The ACLJ is online at www.aclj.org.

American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)
For Print:
Gene Kapp, 757-575-9520
or
For Broadcast:
Christy Lynn Wilson or Todd Shearer, 770-813-0000
Visit
ACLJ Newsroom: www.DeMossNewsPond.com/aclj
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News