Published: March 11, 2010
Knights of Columbus Wins Pledge of Allegiance Case in Federal Appeals Court
SAN FRANCISCO - (BUSINESS WIRE) - The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that the words "one
nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance "do not violate the
Establishment Clause" of the First Amendment to the Constitution.
The Knights of Columbus led the campaign to add the words "under God" to
the Pledge in the early 1950s, and the trial court agreed to allow the
Knights of Columbus to join the present case as defendants when it was
originally filed in 2005.
"This decision is a victory for common sense," Supreme Knight Carl A.
Anderson said. "It is also a welcome reversal of the Ninth Circuit's
2002 decision in a similar case that was ultimately thrown out by the
Supreme Court on technical grounds. Today, the Court got it absolutely
right: recitation of the Pledge is a patriotic exercise, not a religious
prayer. Best of all, the Court said that the words 'under God' add a
'note of importance which a Pledge to our Nation ought to have and which
in our culture ceremonial references to God arouse.' Every reasonable
person knows that, and today's decision is a breath of fresh air from a
court system that has too often seemed to be almost allergic to public
references to God. This is a very good day for America," Anderson
concluded.
In today's ruling, the Court noted that, "Among the 'self-evident
truths' the Framers believed was the concept that all people are
entitled to certain inalienable rights given to them by the 'Laws of
Nature and Nature's God' and that the purpose of government should be to
"secure those rights.'" Such beliefs provide the context in which the
words of the Pledge must be understood, the Court said.
The Knights of Columbus and several individual Knights and their
families were defendant-intervenors in the case, and the court's 2-1
decision incorporates many of the arguments presented to the Court by
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a public interest law firm that
represented the Knights in the case. Oral arguments before the Ninth
Circuit panel had been heard in December 2007. Other defendants in the
case included the United States government and a Sacramento-area school
district.

Knights of Columbus
Patrick Korten, 203-752-4474
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News