Published: January 15, 2010
District Judge Rules in Favor of Texas Ratepayers
AUSTIN, Texas - (BUSINESS WIRE) - In a big win for Texas ratepayers, state District Judge Stephen
Yelenosky today has reversed an order of the PUC awarding billions of
dollars of transmission projects. The City of Garland had alleged that
the Public Utility Commission failed to properly consider the needs of
electric customers when it awarded the wind-related projects last year
and failed to realistically consider low-cost public power entities like
Garland.
As a consequence of his ruling, further transmission line development
relating to the so-called Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ)
process must be suspended until the PUC properly weighs the costs and
benefits to electric customers.
The decision comes in a case brought by Garland's municipally-owned
utility, which has consistently advocated for affordable power on behalf
of its nearly 200,000 electricity users. Garland submitted a proposal in
2008 to participate in the CREZ construction process, but it was
rejected by the PUC in favor of potentially higher-cost plans.
Besides requiring the PUC to reconsider Garland's proposal, Judge
Yelenosky's decision potentially could lead to other CREZ savings -
savings that would be enjoyed by all ERCOT ratepayers - because the
decision requires the PUC to consider costs and benefits of all
the CREZ proposals.
The overall cost of the CREZ lines has been put at about $5 billion - or
$4 for every ratepayer in ERCOT.
"This decision simultaneously encourages customer protection and the
development of clean energy - goals that benefit all Texans," said
Garland City Attorney Brad Neighbor. "The PUC should not put the
interests of big transmission line developers before the interests of
Texas ratepayers. We applaud this ruling today."
But Neighbor cautioned that if the PUC again excludes municipally-owned
utilities in favor of high cost out-of-state and foreign companies,
Texas consumers will end up losing again. In the order that was reversed
today by the Court, the PUC had awarded hundreds of millions of dollars
in CREZ construction projects to foreign and out-of-state companies,
including a Spanish consortium.
Because it is municipally owned, the Garland utility operates on a
not-for-profit basis, does not pay various taxes as commercial ventures
do, and can borrow money at a lower cost. Such advantages allow Garland
to build transmission lines at a lower cost than other entities.
A staff expert at the Texas Public Utility Commission presented evidence
during the agency's initial CREZ deliberations that Garland, of all the
applicants, enjoyed the lowest cost of debt. The expert stated that
"assigning these facilities to the companies with the lowest cost of
capital is likely to result in the CREZ transmission plan that is of the
lowest cost, and, consequently, in the public interest as it provides
the most potential benefits to consumers of electricity in Texas."
The PUC staff had initially recommended that Garland and another
municipally-owned utility receive a substantial portion of the
construction projects - valued at approximately $400 million - but
unexpectedly reversed itself shortly afterwards. In May 2009, the PUC
awarded CREZ development projects to Oncor, Sharyland, a Spanish
consortium and other transmission developers - all with presumably
higher capital costs than those enjoyed by Garland's utility.
In making this initial decision, the PUC appeared not to have explicitly
considered what's most cost-effective for electric customers. In an
earlier letter to parties in the case, Judge Yelenosky noted that the
"PUC relied upon factors that are not relevant to providing transmission
capacity in a manner most beneficial and cost-effective to electric
customers and based its decision on underlying findings that lack
substantial evidence."
He also noted that there is no substantial evidence that Garland's
proposal would cause a relevant delay in the CREZ process.
"But what could delay the process is failure by other parties to
immediately comply with the court's order," said Garland City Attorney
Neighbor. "We're ready to go. Our plans will save consumers money while
encouraging the development of clean energy. We have the experience to
build, and our not-for-profit status and tax and financing advantages
mean we can save money for Texans."
The City of Garland, through its municipally-owned utility, already
operates more than 130 miles of transmission lines that serve not only
its own customers but also other residents in the Dallas area. Garland
is one of 13 transmission operators certified to operate in ERCOT.
City of Garland
Brad Neighbor, 972-205-2380
City Attorney
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News