Published: November 20, 2009
Why the L.A. Clean Truck Program is Worth Fighting For
Geraldine Knatz, Ph.D., Executive Director, The Port of Los Angeles,
made the following statement regarding the L.A. Clean Truck Program:
SAN PEDRO, Calif. - (BUSINESS WIRE) - Just over a year ago, the Port of Los Angeles started the Clean Truck
Program (CTP), a groundbreaking initiative designed to take the truck
pollution issue head-on, once and for all. Prior to the implementation
of the CTP, pollution generated by port-related sources (trucks, trains,
ships, etc.) was such an issue that mounting health concerns and legal
threats paralyzed port expansion efforts and threatened Southern
California's future viability as the nation's largest cargo gateway.
As part of the CTP, we are developing long-term business relationships
with the hundreds of trucking companies that routinely access port
terminals. Through their concession agreements with the Port of Los
Angeles, these companies are accountable for operating and maintaining
trucks that meet local and state emissions requirements and also for the
safety and security performance of their drivers. Our concessionaires
represent 700 area trucking companies, 80 percent of which are small
businesses with less than 50 trucks. We have concessionaires with as few
as one or two individuals.
Now, the Port of Los Angeles is engaged in a lawsuit with the American
Trucking Associations (ATA) over our right to have access controls for
the thousands of trucks that enter into our cargo terminals each day.
The ATA was successful in getting the court to stop our direct
enforcement of the truck replacement program against trucking companies,
as well as a requirement that these companies gradually transition over
to using employee drivers - a measure that would have made our port more
secure and our program more sustainable over the long-term. But the ATA
is not stopping there. In fact, the most significant legal fight our
port continues to wage with the ATA is over our ability to use
concessions, or enforceable agreements, to hold trucking companies
responsible for the trucks and drivers they dispatch to our port.
Instead, if problems arise with any of these thousands of contracted
drivers or their trucks, the ATA wants the port to chase down those
individual truckers - an enforcement measure that is neither practical
nor realistic.
We argue the opposite position. We believe in creating accountable,
self-reliant trucking companies that can continue to operate clean truck
fleets for generations to come. And we have already seen the benefits of
a program tailored to this goal. So far, the CTP has created a more
efficient trucking system. Our roads and facilities aren't overwhelmed
by thousands of independent truckers who drive rates below the true cost
of business, cannot afford to purchase and maintain clean trucks - even
with significant public subsidies - and, as a result, operate dirty
trucks at the expense of the community's health and safety.
Yes, the ATA will extol its support for cleaner truck fleets and cleaner
air. And, not surprisingly, it's not opposed to the tens of millions of
dollars in local and federal subsidies and incentives that have helped
truck operators purchase clean trucks. The ATA contends that if we have
come so far so quickly - reducing truck emissions by as much as 70
percent since October 2008 - our mission is accomplished and we should
stop arguing for program requirements like concession agreements. But
who will pay for the next fleet of clean trucks when today's new trucks
will need to be replaced? It's too soon to pat ourselves on the back for
a job well done.
Our concession program was not set up to replace the present fleet of
port trucks and say "mission accomplished!" We didn't set out to clear
the air for one point in time. Our challenge - and what the ATA fails to
acknowledge - is that emissions standards are a moving target. If that
wasn't the case, perhaps we could wipe our hands, say "we're done" and
move on. But we know that even today's cleanest trucks will not pass
2020 environmental standards, when mandatory caps will push greenhouse
gas emissions back to 1990 levels. Even the next generation of trucks
will fall short of those 2020 clean air standards.
As the largest port in the nation and a major economic engine in a
region with legacy air quality issues, we need to operate in the "now" and
plan for the future. Accordingly, the Port of Los Angeles' Clean Truck
Program wasn't designed to be a quick win and a one-shot deal, but
rather a long-term solution for ensuring that our port trucking system
will be environmentally clean, financially self-reliant and continually
upgraded. And that's a goal worth fighting for.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=6105131&lang=en
Port of Los Angeles
Phillip Sanfield, 310-732-0430
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News