Published: August 26, 2009
Restricting Innovation is Hurting Indian Patients: USIBC's Coalition for Healthy India
NEW DELHI, India - (BUSINESS WIRE) - U.S.-India Business Council supported 'Coalition for Healthy India'
released the findings of its report on "The Value of Incremental
Pharmaceutical Innovation: Benefits for Indian Patients and Indian
Business" . The report highlights and substantiates the impact of
restrictive policies in India, with respect to medical and
pharmaceutical innovation. The report adds a patient-centric perspective
to the public discourse on IPR and drug patents and points out the
positive impact that incremental innovation can have on patient care in
India.
|
|
|
Report Highlights:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
The CHI report notes that in the early 1990's in India,
pharmaceutical R&D as a percentage of sales jumped from 0.4% to as
much as 4.8% by 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
By 2006, after India began to allow patents on pharmaceutical
products, India's three largest pharmaceutical firms - Dr. Reddy's,
Sun Pharmaceuticals, and Ranbaxy - were investing almost 12-18% of
their annual sales revenue in R&D. That's on par with the leading
global innovator firms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Extending patent protection to incremental pharmaceutical innovation
should encourage Indian pharmaceutical companies to expand further
their investment in innovation and ultimately become major sources
of new drug products for both the Indian and global markets.
|
Coalition for Healthy India is a USIBC initiative, aimed at ensuring
that Indian patients have access to the latest and most effective
treatments and cures. CHI brings together like-minded members of the
U.S. and Indian business communities, non-governmental organizations,
patient advocacy organizations and health professionals to coordinate
and support improved access to quality healthcare in India.
According to Greg Kalbaugh, Director and Counsel at the USIBC,
"It is unfortunate that the voice of the patient seems to have been lost
in the debate on intellectual property and drug patents. Incremental
pharmaceutical innovation has very real benefits for Indian patients,
since it leads to the development of life-saving drugs as well as drugs
that markedly improve quality of life for Indian patients. By no means
are these innovations 'minor.'" He continued with a vivid example: "Heat
stable versions of anti-retroviral drugs may not be critically important
to people in large cities where there's easy access to electricity and
refrigeration, but they're surely important to people in rural areas.
Citizens in rural areas deserve to know that when they take a drug, it's
going to work whether they have access to refrigeration or not.
Unfortunately, section 3(d) of India's patent law actively discourages
just that sort of life-saving innovation. For the sake of patients, it
needs to change. And it needs to change for the sake of their employers,
all of whom count on having healthy employees."
In recent years, incremental pharmaceutical innovations have accounted
for as much as 65% of new drug approvals by regulatory agencies. Over
60% of the drugs on the World Health Organization' list of essential
medicines reflect incremental improvements of older drugs.
"The conclusion is clear: by preventing many valuable pharmaceutical
innovations from receiving patent protection, Section 3(d) of India's
Patents Act inhibits the development of safer, more efficacious and more
useful drugs for Indian patients," stated the author of the report,
Raj Gandesha, a senior lawyer with the global law firm of White & Case
LLP. Mr. Gandesha continued "It is critically important that we
actively encourage the discovery of new forms and uses of existing
chemical compounds or substances. These efforts in-turn will lead to the
development of safer, more efficacious and more useful drugs that are
better-suited to particular patient profiles or needs and ultimately
result in improved patient compliance and greater overall well-being."
Addressing concerns about so-called "ever-greening" , Mr. Kalbaugh
pointed out that Ever-greening is a made-up controversy. "A patent on an
incremental pharmaceutical innovation does not bar a generic company
from selling a generic version of the original drug product once the
patent covering that product has expired. In fact, generic competition
can constrain the price of products based on later incremental
innovations. Moreover, incremental pharmaceutical innovations themselves
can increase price competition, by increasing the number of different
drugs that exist within a given class."
The speakers noted that the report is intended to add a patient-centric
perspective to the public discourse, which till now has been largely
dominated by more powerful economic constituents. Several participants
pointed out that the Mashelkar Committee report, recently accepted by
India's government, bolsters the message that Section 3(d) is in need of
reform.
Coalition for Healthy India brings together like-minded members
of the U.S. and Indian business communities, non-governmental
organizations, patient advocacy organizations and health professionals
dedicated to ensuring that Indian patients have access to the latest and
most effective treatments and cures.
www.ahealthyindia.org
U.S.-India Business Council
Greg Kalbaugh
202-463-5778
gkalbaugh@uschamber.com
Copyright © 2012, Business Wire, Inc., All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News