NewsBlaze search box Daily News header

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Film Review

By     get stories by email

Boy Wizard Back at Hogwarts for More Hair-Raising Hijinks

Nothing I say here could possibly have any effect one way or the other on the hordes of Harry Potter faithful flocking to see this eagerly-anticipated, sixth installment in the franchise based on the phenomenally-popular series of children's novels by J.K. Rowling. Furthermore, because the process of adapting any novel to the screen invariably involves making considerable compromises for the sake of the medium, Potter purists might prefer to read a discussion comparing the book to the screen version.

This is even more likely the case when you're talking about condensing a fanciful, 652-page opus on the order of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince where conflating characters and eliminating extraneous sidebars is necessary to distill the beloved best seller into a scintillating summer blockbuster. Therefore, it's probably appropriate for this review to address the concerns of those unfamiliar with the books but still interested in knowing whether they're likely to enjoy the movie merely as an action adventure in its own right.

For that demographic I have great news. "Yes!" Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince offers a compelling cinematic experience even for folks such as yours truly who don't know the difference between a "Muggle" and a "Mudblood." (FYI, the former is a term used to refer to a person without magical powers, while the latter applies to anyone of non-magic parentage.) But the uninitiated need not worry about such fine distinctions in the Potter lexicon, since this flick's formulaic storyline is straightforward enough to follow without a glossary.


The film was again directed by David Yates who reassembled all the members of the principal cast, including Daniel Radcliffe as the boy wizard who is supposedly just reaching puberty. Rather than hide his 20 year-old star's five o'clock shadow under pancake makeup, Yates has opted for lighthearted concessions to Harry's maturity like having someone suggest, "Harry, you need a shave."

Approaching adulthood equally-rapidly are Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, back reprising their roles as Harry's best friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, respectively. Also returning are Alan Rickman as Severus Snape, Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy, Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid, Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall, Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange and Julie Walters as Molly Weasley. And noteworthy additions to the ensemble include Jim Broadbent as newly-appointed Professor Slughorn and Jessie Cave as Ron's love interest Lavender Brown.

Picking up precisely where the previous picture left off, the Half-Blood Prince opens with Harry licking his wounds from his bloody fight inside the Ministry of Magic with his archenemy, Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes). And we see how Voldemort's minions, the Death Eaters, are presently wreaking havoc all over London.

Next, Professor Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) encourages a reluctant Harry to return to Hogwarts and enlists the lad's help in recruiting Horace Slughorn to teach a course there in Potions. Harry subsequently reunites with pals Ron and Hermione for a very eventful semester at the storied School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Besides the trademark hocus-pocus, the campus is abuzz with raging hormones.

There are so many romances blossoming around the castle, you almost need a scorecard to keep track of them. Let's see, Ron settles for Lavender when Hermione gives him the cold shoulder. Harry has the hots for Ron's sister, Ginny (Bonnie Wright), but so does Dean Thomas (Alfie Enoch).

Harry proves far more concerned about monitoring the movements of his classmate Draco Malfoy and of inscrutable Professor Severus Snape whom he suspects to be in league with demonic Lord Voldemort. The truth comes out during a dramatic confrontation in the Astronomy Tower which sets the stage for the next sequel.
Potter hits puberty!

Excellent (4 stars)
Rated PG for violence, frightening images, mild epithets and some sensuality.
Running time: 153 minutes
Studio: Warner Brothers

Kam Williams is a syndicated film and book critic who writes for 100+ publications. He is a member of the New York Film Critics Online, the African-American Film Critics Association, and the NAACP Image Awards Nominating Committee. Contact him through NewsBlaze.

  Please click this get stories by email button to be notified about future stories, and please leave a comment below.

  Please leave a comment here     If it does not display within 10 seconds, please refresh the page

Related Movie Reviews News

When Hollywood releases a violent action film, 'loosely-based' on truth, it's certain that Hollywood is about to play fast and loose with the historical record.
Prairie Miller has a conversation with Will Smith, David Morse and Concussion director, Peter Landesman, plus news of the Zomba Prison project and Star Wars.
The Women Film Critics Circle is a gathering of national and international women's voices presenting a fresh and differently experienced viewpoint from the primarily white male dominated film criticism world.
Surreal sequences instead of theme, and pretentious vinaigrettes replace what should be a slice-of-life experience. It is art house, without the art, tedious to watch.
This true story about a transgender man suffers badly from overkill. At two hours, it's too long; the music is too dramatic; the actors try too hard and there's much too much crying.
Prairie Miller talks to Elizabeth Hurley about The Royals, and to Nina Paley, artist, filmmaker, animator, cartoonist and free culture copyright activist.


NewsBlaze Writers Of The Month

Popular Stories This Month

newsletter logo

Copyright © 2004-2016 NewsBlaze Pty. Ltd.
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice               Press Room   |    Visit NewsBlaze Mobile Site