Daily News logo Newsletter logo   Search News     Daily News   

Another Complaint Moved Against Salman Khan and Ajay Devgan for Smoking

  Share With Friends

By


It looks like that Ajay Devgan did not learn anything from the complaint made against him for smoking at the Chandigarh Airport. While shooting for a movie at the Kurali (Punjab) railway station, he just not violated the tobacco control law himself but also had Salman Khan for his company. As a result, on the basis of video recording and television transmission by a news channel, another complaint against both of them has been lodged with the "Railway Protection Force" here today. A complaint was also registered with the Chandigarh Police yesterday against Ajay Devgan.

The complaint has been moved by Hemant Goswami, a social activist who is also a member of the National Steering Committee on Tobacco Control formed by the Union Ministry of Health. Goswami has also asked the Indian railways to cancel the permission to shoot on the railway premises if the film crew team did not adhere to the law of the land.

It has been mentioned in the complaint by Goswami that both Sh. Ajay Devgan S/o Sh. Veeru Devgan aged around 39 year and Sh. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan aged around 43 years had both violated the provisions of section 4 of the "Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act 2003 (COTPA)," Section 278, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 167 of the Railways Act 1989.

Hemant also demanded action against the Station Master, the police officers and other government servant and other people under Section 176 of the IPC as they were duty bound under section 39 of the Criminal Procedure Code to provide information to the nearest Magistrate or police officer about the offence of Section 278 committed by Mr. Ajay Devgan and Mr. Salman Khan. Since the station master and other public officers were also authorised to take action as per the Schedule III to be read with Rule 3 and 5 of "Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places Rules, 2008" and they had failed to take cognizance so action under section 166 of the IPC has also requested against all such public servants.

Aman Loonaa, Journalist,
Chandigarh


 
Support Wikipedia


Follow NewsBlaze

on Twitter

@newsblaze


Find more stories recommended by Stumbleupon.

newsletter logo

What's Hot?
1 .Unrest Continues on Eve of Uprising Anniversary in Bahrain - 36
2 .Religion of Peace Demonstration Hoax Photos - 22
3 .Husbands-Don't Commit These Valentine's Day Insults! - 25
4 .Young Adult Movie Review - 14
5 .Bullhead Review: The Meat Market, Steroids And Masculine Identity Addictions - 13
6 .Early Marriage Has Harmful Effects on Women - 12
7 .Fireproof Movie Review - 11
8 .How Did Jorelys Rivera's Killer Get Some River Ridge Security Access Codes? - 21
9 .These 10 Comfortable Walking Shoes Are a Step in the Right Direction - 10
10 .Give a Great Valedictorian Speech -Joey Asher - 9
Updated: 7:00 PST     1924

NewsBlaze Editors

editors

NewsBlaze Writers


Writers Wanted

Help NewsBlaze provide daily news, including top stories, Home and Garden, Technology, The Environment and more. NewsBlaze Writer

Follow NewsBlaze

NewsBlaze Social Media Logos NewsBlaze Facebook NewsBlaze LinkedIn NewsBlaze Twitter NewsBlaze YouTube NewsBlaze MySpace
NewsBlaze 
Copyright © 2004-2012 NewsBlaze LLC
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice |         Press Room