Published: August 17, 2008
AUDIO OF CONFERENCE CALL: U.S. Army Major General Paul Eaton (Ret.), Congressman Chet Edwards (D-TX), and Army Veteran Brian McGough Address John McCain's Record Ahead of VFW Convention
WASHINGTON, Aug. 17 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- With John McCain scheduled
to address the 109th National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of
the U.S. inOrlando, Florida, U.S. Army Major General Paul Eaton (Ret.),
Congressman Chet Edwards (D-TX), Chairman of the House Military Construction
and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Subcommittee, and Army veteran Brian
McGough, who served in bothIraq andAfghanistan, held a press conference call
on John McCain's record on veterans' issues.
The audio of the call can be heard at the following link:
http://www.democrats.org/page/-/audio/calls/081708_ConfCall_Veterans.mp3
Below are excerpts of the call:
Major General Paul Eaton (Ret.)
[:39]
"There's a great myth that the Republican Party has propagated that
they're good for defense, better for defense than the Democratic Party, and
that they're good for veterans. And in fact, nothing could be farther from the
truth. We have suffered eight years of significant underfunding and underfocus
from this Administration, and my great fear is that Senator McCain would
continue that process.
[7:20]
"I'd like to address this last assault on veterans and the benefits that
we have promised every man and woman who have served in the armed forces of
the United States. This Senator McCain initiative and comment that he
submitted to a town hall meeting that we needed to ration health care to
veterans is absolutely bankrupt thinking. And I have served with too many
soldiers and I have witnessed too many dramas in the soldiers' lives, and that
of their families. The last thing we need to do is ration health care under
the guise that we're only going to give it to men and women who have been
injured in direct combat. I don't know how you categorize that, and define
that issue, but it does once again back up the Bush Administration's approach
to underfund the Veterans Administration and to underserve the veterans who
have fought so well for this country."
Congressman Chet Edwards (D-TX)
[1:29]
"All Americans, myself included, deeply respect Sen. McCain's military
service and sacrifice in the Vietnam War. But, most Americans would be
surprised and disappointed to find out that Sen. McCain has repeatedly voted
against improved health care and benefits for millions of veterans. It's
difficult to understand how, during a time of war, that Sen. McCain can
support massive tax cuts for Exxon-Mobil and people making over $1 million a
year, while saying, via his votes, that we cannot afford to increase funding
for veterans' health care and benefits."
[9:18]
"Lifetime voting record from the DAV for John McCain is 39%, and for
Barack Obama it's 89%. I think that will surprise a lot of Americans and
disappoint a lot of veterans. TheIraq and Afghan war veterans give John
McCain a "D," as in David, and Obama a "B+," as in Brother.
[10:35] "I think, despite his service, distinguished service to our
country, his political record on veterans has been out of touch and often
wrong."
Brian McGough
[4:11]
"I was in the Army for 11 years. I was inIraq andAfghanistan. I was
injured inIraq. I've been fighting for veterans' benefits and veterans'
rights for a long time. Sen. McCain has a pattern of trying to fix veteran
issues by cutting corners, plain and simple. TheWebb/Hagel GI bill is a good
example of that. Sen. McCain was opposed to the bill from day one. Now, that
bill passed both the House and the Senate, which is great news. Under that
bill, I would be able to go to college while getting a stipend and having the
VA pay for all of my books, all of my labs. Sen. McCain tried to introduce a
bill that would have just given the old Montgomery GI bill a little bit of a
bump, and people would have had to stay in service for anywhere from 6 to 12
years to get that."
[8:35]
"I have a friend who actually lost his leg in a training incident. So if
were to ration health care to only combat veterans we would be saying to him
that his service, where he lost a leg in a training incident where an
artillery round went off to close to him, his service isn't good enough,
because he got wounded before he went to combat. It wasn't his choice not to
go to combat, he got wounded in an accident training to go to combat. And we
can't tell people that just because they didn't go to combat they don't need
care. It's the veterans affairs hospital, Veterans Administration, not the
combat-wounded hospital."
Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee,
www.democrats.org.
This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's
committee.
SOURCE Democratic National Committee
Copyright © 2012, PRNewswire
Copyright © 2012, NewsBlaze,
Daily News