NEWS

WIRES

OTHER

Boehner, Blunt Urge Speaker to Pair SPR with 'Legitimate, Production-Based' Energy Plan for American Consumers

"Any additional supply we can add to the pipeline in the short-term is supply we ought to be looking at -- and we've been heartened that by bringing up the SPR plan Democrats are conceding a link between increasing our supply and reducing our price at the pump. But American families and small businesses expect and deserve more from this Congress than a couple-cent price reduction from SPR; they expect and deserve legitimate production-based solutions that will keep gasoline prices affordable and American dependence on foreign sources of energy to an absolute minimum. They expect that energy to be produced promptly, efficiently, and in an environmentally responsible manner. We can do that and we should. But now, more than two years after Democrats promised a 'commonsense plan' to lower gas prices, isn't it time they joined Republicans in actually producing one?"

The text of the letter is as follows:

May 12, 2008

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi

Speaker of the House

H-232, U.S. Capitol

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Speaker Pelosi,

The retail price for a gallon of gasoline has increased by more than 55 percent since January 2007, a sharp and sudden spike in a near-essential commodity that has caused real economic and personal hardships for millions of Americans. On this issue, these families deserve more from Congress than typical partisan bickering; they deserve genuine solutions that will help lower the price of gas.

On April 24, you cited the immediate suspension of crude oil deliveries to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as one initiative that could help lower gasoline prices. According to documents posted on your website, "Filling the [Strategic Petroleum Reserve] takes 70,000 barrels of oil off the market each day... Suspending these government purchases, as we have done in the past, could reduce gas prices by 5 to 24 cents a gallon -- a critical first step for America's families, businesses, and the economy."

As you suggest, however, suspending Strategic Petroleum Reserve purchases is just a "first step." While some Democrats have called on OPEC to produce more oil, we believe it is absolutely critical that we come together on a responsible plan to produce more of the energy resources we have right here at home. Demonstrating a strong new commitment to exploring our own resources would help add additional energy supplies to the pipeline. But more than that, in the short term, it would send a clear and unambiguous signal to the world that Americans will no longer abide these prices, no longer allow our dependence to grow, and no longer let weather patterns and geopolitical events half-a-world away impact so dramatically the price we pay for essential energy.

Additionally, from a supply-and-demand perspective, increased production opportunities will discourage speculation in the market that feeds off the expectation that demand will continue to increase while supply remains constant. This too will reduce gasoline prices in the short term. And as we know, over the long term the introduction of new supplies will certainly reduce prices.

By how much? Well, calling upon the logic you employed to derive the price reduction from redirecting 70,000 barrels of oil a day from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, it stands to reason that bringing online the one-million barrels a day the Interior Department says is available in ANWR would reduce gasoline prices by 14 times the price reduction achieved by redirecting oil from the SPR. And though estimates of recoverable deepwater resources along our Outer Continental Shelf are notoriously outmoded, the 80 billion barrels of oil we believe is there right now would constitute a price reduction several times larger than redirecting oil from the SPR.

In addition, in just three western states (Colorado,Utah, andWyoming) there are 1.5 trillion barrels of oil shale. Given that is six times the oil reserves inSaudi Arabia, unlocking these resources could clearly reduce gasoline prices for American consumers. We would note that all of these energy reforms can, and should, be implemented in a way that protects our environment.

Therefore, we request that in addition to scheduling legislation that implements your proposal to temporarily suspend filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, you include a proposal to bring ANWR online, authorize development of our deep ocean oil resources, and / or remove the restrictions for commercial oil shale leases on federal properties. We believe such a bipartisan proposal would quickly pass the Congress and provide relief to millions of Americans who are now struggling with the high cost of gasoline. We anxiously await your reply.

Sincerely,

John Boehner

Republican Leader

Roy Blunt

Republican Whip

SOURCE House Republican Whip Roy Blunt