Daily News logo Newsletter logo   Search News    

Emotions After An Attack Help Determine Our Thoughts About The Terrorists

  Share This Story

By  

A study published in the latest issue of Political Psychology surveyed a national sample of Americans to examine if their feelings surrounding September 11th affected their thoughts.

The author found that when asked to focus on anger, participants reflected on the causes of the attack (terrorists). When asked to think about what made them most sad, participants thought less about causes; the authors suggest this may be because participants were more focused on the consequences (victims).

The survey asked the participants what makes them most angry/sad about the attacks and instructed them to describe this in detail and explain why. Participants were encouraged to write descriptions that could make a reader feel the same emotion. Both emotions elicited thoughtful responses of roughly the same length. The results show that anger evoked casual judgments more frequently than sadness. A focus on anger may lead to a desire for actions against the offenders while a focus on loss or sadness may prompt actions targeting victims, such as healing.

The findings suggest that different emotions direct our attention to certain aspects of terrorism, possibly driving our reactions. The author explains, "Blaming individuals or governments might drive preferences for retaliatory responses, whereas blaming situational factors might drive preferences toward less hostile approaches."

This study by assistant professor Deborah A. Small is published in the April issue of Political Psychology. Political Psychology, the journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, is dedicated to the analysis of the interrelationships between psychological and political processes.

Deborah A. Small is an assistant professor at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Small's research interfaces psychology and economics, examining fundamental processes that underlie human decision making. Small primarily focuses on two areas of inquiry: sympathy biases, and the role of specific emotions in judgment and choice. She can be contacted at deborahs@wharton.upenn.edu

Source: Blackwell Publishing


 
Support Wikipedia

NeswBlaze top writers

Find more stories recommended by Stumbleupon.

newsletter logo

What's Hot?
1 .Relationships At Work, The True Key for Success - 39
2 .Supermodel Bar Refaeli Adorns the Cover of the 2009 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue on Newsstands Today! - 36
3 .Waterless 'Air Cooler PLUS' Beats Summer's Heat Without Making Your Home Muggy - 13
4 .The Ill Effects of Chewing Gum - 9
5 .How Kids Can Succeed In Hollywood - 12
6 .Latest Developments in Mickey Shunick Case: Suspicious White Pickup Truck! - 10
7 .Kalio Enables Consumers to 'Touch' Products with New KalioTablet Extension for iPad and Android - 10
8 .Very Young Girls Movie Review: Sex, Class and Ho Daddies - 8
9 .Access to Low-Cost Energy Vital to Eradicate Extreme Poverty - 7
10 .These 10 Comfortable Walking Shoes Are a Step in the Right Direction - 8
Updated: 5:45 PDT     1369

NewsBlaze Editors

editors

NewsBlaze Writers

news writer images

Writers Wanted

Help NewsBlaze provide daily news, including top stories, Home and Garden, Technology, The Environment and more. NewsBlaze Writer

Follow NewsBlaze

NewsBlaze Social Media Logos NewsBlaze Facebook NewsBlaze LinkedIn NewsBlaze Twitter NewsBlaze YouTube NewsBlaze MySpace NewsBlaze Fan Page NewsBlaze StumbleUpon NewsBlaze Political Cartoons NewsBlaze Editorial Cartoons
NewsBlaze 
Copyright © 2004-2012 NewsBlaze LLC
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice |         Press Room