Daily News logo Newsletter logo   Search News     Daily News   

Emotions After An Attack Help Determine Our Thoughts About The Terrorists

  Share With Friends

By  

A study published in the latest issue of Political Psychology surveyed a national sample of Americans to examine if their feelings surrounding September 11th affected their thoughts.

The author found that when asked to focus on anger, participants reflected on the causes of the attack (terrorists). When asked to think about what made them most sad, participants thought less about causes; the authors suggest this may be because participants were more focused on the consequences (victims).

The survey asked the participants what makes them most angry/sad about the attacks and instructed them to describe this in detail and explain why. Participants were encouraged to write descriptions that could make a reader feel the same emotion. Both emotions elicited thoughtful responses of roughly the same length. The results show that anger evoked casual judgments more frequently than sadness. A focus on anger may lead to a desire for actions against the offenders while a focus on loss or sadness may prompt actions targeting victims, such as healing.

The findings suggest that different emotions direct our attention to certain aspects of terrorism, possibly driving our reactions. The author explains, "Blaming individuals or governments might drive preferences for retaliatory responses, whereas blaming situational factors might drive preferences toward less hostile approaches."

This study by assistant professor Deborah A. Small is published in the April issue of Political Psychology. Political Psychology, the journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, is dedicated to the analysis of the interrelationships between psychological and political processes.

Deborah A. Small is an assistant professor at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Small's research interfaces psychology and economics, examining fundamental processes that underlie human decision making. Small primarily focuses on two areas of inquiry: sympathy biases, and the role of specific emotions in judgment and choice. She can be contacted at deborahs@wharton.upenn.edu

Source: Blackwell Publishing


 
Support Wikipedia


Follow NewsBlaze

on Twitter

@newsblaze


Find more stories recommended by Stumbleupon.

newsletter logo

What's Hot?
1 .Texas: Cops Pull Over Drunk Cowgirl Wearing Only Cowboy Boots - 22
2 .Early Marriage Has Harmful Effects on Women - 17
3 .Effective Costa Rica Marketing Ranks Country as Top Brand in Latin America - 15
4 .Supermodel Bar Refaeli Adorns the Cover of the 2009 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue on Newsstands Today! - 21
5 .Insitu Delivers Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Systems Capability to Marines - 24
6 .Christian Evangelist Father Johnson Reveals That India Embraces Christianity - 12
7 .BOLLYWOOD actress in HOLLYWOOD lesbian film - 12
8 .Give a Great Valedictorian Speech -Joey Asher - 9
9 .Censorship in America - 10
10 .Underground Bounty Hunter: The Bounty Just Got Bigger - 9
Updated: 7:45 PST     2470

NewsBlaze Editors

editors

NewsBlaze Writers


Writers Wanted

Help NewsBlaze provide daily news, including top stories, Home and Garden, Technology, The Environment and more. NewsBlaze Writer

Follow NewsBlaze

NewsBlaze Social Media Logos NewsBlaze Facebook NewsBlaze LinkedIn NewsBlaze Twitter NewsBlaze YouTube NewsBlaze MySpace
NewsBlaze 
Copyright © 2004-2012 NewsBlaze LLC
Use of this website is subject to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy  | DMCA Notice |         Press Room